5 Frames with the Yashica Minister III

By Walter Reumkens

When the name Yashica appears in 35mmc, it is often in connection with a CONTAX camera, after Zeiss agreed to collaborate with Yashica Kyocera on the construction of Contax SLR cameras. It was not without reason that Yashica, which had previously produced good cameras with very good lenses, but had led a shadowy existence, at least in Germany, was chosen. When I became interested in rangefinder cameras a few years ago, I didn’t choose a Leica camera, which would have been obvious given the proximity of the Leitz factory, but instead chose cameras from Canon, Konica, Olympus, Yashica, Voigtländer and even FED, Kiev and Zorki. All together, they were perhaps as expensive as a serviced Leica with a Cron 50mm lens, but not necessarily inferior in quality and results. After all, it is the photographer who takes the photo. The film also plays a role. And so on and so forth. But I don’t want to go into that further here; it is an individual decision and also depends on experiences in the environment. Less so on publications in the media.

So four years ago, this Yashica Minister III came into my possession, purchased in Bologna, Italy, freshly serviced by a small dealer for €70, and fully functional. The technical details of this camera can be found in abundance on the internet, so I won’t go into them here short of sharing these specifications:

  • Lens: Yashinon-DX
  • Focal length: 45mm
  • Aperture: f/2.8 to f/22
  • Focus range: 0.8 m (2.6 ft)
  • Lens mount: Fixed
  • Shutter: Citizen
  • Speeds: 1 s to 1/500 s
  • Flash: PC socket
  • Film size: 35 mm

This is a rangefinder camera from Yashica, which was fairly standard for its time (1960). It is almost exactly the same size as Zeiss Ikon’s Contessa LKE from the same period and also looks very similar. It is slightly larger than Voigtlander’s Vitomatic II, which is a little older.

The camera is quite heavy – 656 g including a 24-exposure film cartridge. You’ll really notice this weight at the end of a busy day of shooting. It is 135mm long and 85mm high. The body is 35mm thick, which increases to 85mm with the lens attached.

I took my first shots with it using a Fujifilm C200 and was quite impressed. The camera is easy to use – the exposure meter works well, as does the viewfinder. I had some flare when shooting into the sun, but I didn’t use a remote aperture. In general, the lens has good contrast and colour reproduction. The shots were taken on a hike in my local area. The exposure was set with the camera, and comparative measurements with the Sekonic Twinmate L-208 did not yield any different results.

The film was developed and scanned at my local minilab without any processing.

Please judge for yourself.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Walter Reumkens
Born and living in Moenchengladbach (Germany), retired administrative expert and IT specialist, hobby photographer analogue + digital since 1975, no main topics.
Read More Articles From Walter Reumkens

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Michael Zwicky-Ross on 5 Frames with the Yashica Minister III

Comment posted: 07/02/2026

That has brought back memories for me of when my parents used one of those. I wonder what happened to it. Thank you for the reminder
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 07/02/2026

I'm glad to hear that, Michael. If the camera is stored in a dark place, the selenium exposure meter will probably still work. Thank you for your feedback.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on 5 Frames with the Yashica Minister III

Comment posted: 07/02/2026

Thanks for this, I used to have a Minister D!
Lovely sharp photos great lens!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 07/02/2026

The Minister D had the advantage of CDS metering, if I'm not mistaken. I don't know how long the selenium cells will last. In my opinion, all Yashica lenses are very good, whether rangefinder or later SLR. The cameras were also reliable. It's not without reason that Carl Zeiss entered into a partnership with Yashica for the new edition of the Contax SLR. Thank you for your comment. Have a nice weekend. Ibraar!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 07/02/2026

Yes as I remember it was metered but had the strange linked aperture and shutter speed on the barrel My standard lens on my RTS II is a Yashica 50mm f2 - lovely lens. I don't own any zeiss as for what I snap this is good enough with a lot of character

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Russell John Rosener on 5 Frames with the Yashica Minister III

Comment posted: 07/02/2026

A surprisingly sharp lens on that camera. Superb natural color as well. I had a Yashica Electro GL and wish now I had kept it. Now about aviation... that looks like a Junkers F13 in the background!? And is it flyable or just for show? A very cool artifact of early civil aviation and the little brother of the famous Ju-52 Tri Motor.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 07/02/2026

The photo shows the Hugo Junkers Hangar in Mönchengladbach. Hugo Junkers was born in Rheydt, a district of Mönchengladbach, where he completed his secondary education and later built aeroplanes. This hangar was built a few years ago in his memory and honour. A JU-52 is stationed there, which is still airworthy but is no longer allowed to fly due to EU environmental regulations. The F13 is a replica, sponsored by the Association of Friends of Historic Aircraft, which has found a home there: https://www.vfl-ev.de/index.html#hangar In addition to the Minister, I also have three Electro 35 models. The lenses are all very good, as are the Yashinon ML with Contax/Yashica bayonet mount, which I use on a Yashica FR1 and Contax RTS. They are not necessarily worse than Carl Zeiss lenses. Thank you for your interest and your kind words.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson on 5 Frames with the Yashica Minister III

Comment posted: 08/02/2026

Nice shooting, Walter!
My favorites are the first shot with the grove of trees planted in perfect formation and perfect 90 degree spit of land on a lake or canal, and the vividly red umbrellas against the grey hangar and pale sky. You are right that the eye of the photographer is the indispensable piece of equipment. I'm also impressed with the Fujifilm 200 Color. I haven't tried it, but this post makes me want to!
Cheers,
s
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 08/02/2026

Thanks Scott, I'm glad you like it. I have the same favourites, I also wanted to show the "green" of Fujifilm, which is very intense. As well as a typical old railway station in a small town in my home country, especially as it has been renovated, which is not often found. There are no people in the picture, I know, I've written about it here before, it's very difficult to get consent, even if you have good preliminary discussions. We differ greatly from the USA in this respect. I would like to add something about the Fujifilm C200. My film was still manufactured in Japan. During the pandemic, Fujifilm discontinued production of the C200 and X-Tra Superia 400 in Japan due to a lack of raw materials. Both films now bear the "Made in USA" label and are said to be manufactured by Kodak in Rochester. After comparing the barcodes, the C200 appears to be a Kodak Gold 200. I haven't been able to compare them yet, as Fujifilm 200 was hardly available in Europe or was considerably more expensive than Gold 200. I now enjoy using it, especially as it is available as 35mm and 120 roll film. So it's not just Ukrainian films, it's not always what it says on the tin. Thank you for your interest, Scott!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Omar Tibi on 5 Frames with the Yashica Minister III

Comment posted: 08/02/2026

Great shots Walter! Always great to see some of your photos make it to 35mmc. :)

I'm impressed by how true to life and modern the lens rendering is, despite the age. It's not the same, but when I compare it to my similar-period Voskhod (1967), the latter renders more "vintage". Of course, the Voskhod has a triplet while I believe the Minister has a double-Gauss formula lens, but it shows how underrated Yashica is compared to some of the bigger names. Happy shooting my friend!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 08/02/2026

Hello Omar, thank you very much for your kind words! I can't say much about the design, as I only learned about the "Voskhod" from one of your articles. Although I own and use several cameras and lenses from the former Soviet Union, which are often "replicas" of Leitz and Zeiss products. The Voskhod still looks very futuristic today, and at the time it was visually very different from the other, more rustic cameras. They probably wanted to show the world how modern the USSR was. The seller of my Minister III in Italy is probably a precision engineer, and all of the cameras he has for sale have been freshly CLA'd. Perhaps that's why, in addition to the existing quality of the Yashica lenses. And yes, I don't develop my own films, and a professional scanner in a lab is worth its weight in gold. At least that's my experience. I own several Yashica cameras and lenses, and they are all fantastic. To be honest, as a layman, I can't tell the difference in quality between the Contax RTS with the Zeiss Planar 1.7/50mm and the Yashica FR1 with a Yashica ML lens. The results are identical, but the price difference was considerable back then, and still is today for second-hand goods. I hope you enjoy taking photos too, Omar!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

John Andrews on 5 Frames with the Yashica Minister III

Comment posted: 08/02/2026

Hi again Walter, another fine piece of writing with great prints. I have a few similiar rangefinders, A Minolta and Olympus, similiar in weight and lenses to yours , but as you say its the person behind the camera not the camera itself. A nice piece. Take care.

Kind Regards John
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 08/02/2026

Hello John, I am very pleased to receive your praise. At least the person has played a part in this. We know this from your photos. Thank you and have a wonderful time!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Paul Quellin on 5 Frames with the Yashica Minister III

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Hi Walter. The camera produces great results. I found this encouraging to read as I have a 1958 (ish) Yashica 35 rangefinder on my desk just awaiting a couple of parts being reassembled. The front outer cover for the lens was badly dented, perhaps beyond straightening, so I picked up a wrecked 35W from the big auction site, as the lens element is the same and the retaining cover looked the same. It, is the right diameter, but that's all, so I am not considering transplanting the whole front lens element from the 35W onto the 35. They have the same optics as your's I believe, though I don;t know how the coatings might have varied in that short time. Reading your article I am quite keen to see the Yashica 35 in action now. Thanks
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens on 5 Frames with the Yashica Minister III

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Thank you, Paul, for your comment. I'm glad you like the photos. I wasn't familiar with your "Yashica 35" before, so I just looked at the following website: "yashicatlr.com/Yashica35.html". I found the information very interesting, especially since I still own three functional "Electro 35" rangefinder models with fast lenses. All the lenses are very sharp and the camera's internal exposure meter is also accurate. I really hope you succeed with the conversion. I wouldn't be able to do it myself, it would be too much for me, but I assume we'll see photos of it here on 35mmc later.

Thanks Paul, good luck with the repair and all the best!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *