Reflecting on a few of my own failures

By Michael Murray

Inspired by a post from Alexandre KreismanI wanted to present some misses to the community to look for ideas and opportunities for growth.  Below, you’ll find 8 images that I was intentional with, but which just didn’t pan out the way I’d envisioned.  I am hopeful some of you readers will offer your feedback and input with these frames.  I find that, in addition to being fun and engaging, these discussions move my work forward in ways that simply viewing images never has.

Near misses

Here, the subject is the lady in the hat, but she doesn’t stand out.  I didn’t want to use narrow depth of focus, and I wanted the scale of distant buildings, but somehow, this just falls entirely flat.  Uninteresting subject, too many irrelevant elements? Tri-x 35mm at box speed.

I so badly want this image to be great.  I like the geometry, the scale, the various human, natural, and architectural elements.  It doesn’t feel busy, but it just doesn’t have the “it” factor I was hoping for at the moment of exposure.  Also Tri-x box speed.

Ok, let’s ignore the missed focus and tune in to the fuzzy concept.  The first thing that jumps out is the lack of clear subject; was it supposed to be the building?  While I like the curve of the curb, the bright green stands out and carries far too much visual weight for its roll in the composition.

Cool light, decent colors, but what’s the story?  I’m fine with words sometimes, but I don’t want it to be the subject, and it feels like it is here.  These words bear no connection to the rest of the image.

Tri-X exposed at 3200 and pushed 4 stops (6400) at the lab in development.  I think this frame had potential- which is why I shot it- and there are some aspects that work.  The contrast from the scene and the chemical push, the silhouette in the doorway, and the prominence of the concrete beam are strengths to me.  Some hang-ups are the warped lines thanks to my 28-85mm 3.5 Nikkor zoom at its widest focal length, the distracting exit sign, and the shooting angle, which I think is not angled enough.  I didn’t want it straight on, but this angle just feels like I tried to hit straight on but missed.

I considered this image in my post about Phoenix I.  I like the pink against the cool green/gray and fog, but there is something about the placement against that background that I feel could be better.  I was working around a chain link fence so I couldn’t get lower like I wanted, but I do wish I could have put those thistles more against the fog so they rose up above the backing greenery.  This is another one I really want to like, but despite being satisfied with colors, focus, sharpness, and texture, it simply isn’t what it could have been.  I did also struggle with aperture.  In this lighting, I had the choice to go f8 on my 50mm 1.4, but I think I opted for f4 to throw the background into bokeh to a greater degree.  In retrospect, I think I failed to consider how effectively this lens can get that nice blur even at smaller apertures when the lens is at its close focus distance.  The separation is what I wanted, but not all of the flower is in focus, which I was aiming for.

I like the subject and the scene here, as well as the colors and grain of the Lomo ‘92.  I’ve played with cropping off upper sections more and less drastically, but can’t find a good ratio.  I like that there are essentially two colors, and I enjoy the line created by the hose, but I just couldn’t fine an angle that put every element just where I wanted it.  As a side conversation, I’m curious what people’s thoughts are regarding moving things in a scene: against the rules or simple “building” the scene you want?

Starting with the obvious: not enough of the subject is in focus.  I wanted to blur the background, and I actually like how that part turned out, but I really did not get even 20 percent of the car sharp enough.  I should have stopped down 1 or 2, and focused on the license plate.

In advance, I really appreciate the time you’ve taken to look through and read.  I know time is precious and any amount we give to an endeavor is time we lose for other things.

Eagerly awaiting insights from this wonderful community,

-Michael

 

Share this post:

About The Author

By Michael Murray
Long time hobbyist of 35mm film photography. An ecstatic patron of scenes of simple humanity compellingly and naturally lit.
Read More Articles From Michael Murray

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Hamish Gill on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

I love the shot of the road with the closed doors! The light is great, and I find images of liminal spaces very pleasing - see some of mine here: https://35mmc.platform81preview.com/13/04/2020/exploring-worcesters-former-fire-station/

The issue with the shot is, imho, just the angle. It's not quite on or off angle enough to feel quite right.

I also think the shot of the chair would work if you just straightened it a bit
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Thanks, Hamish. Luckily, this spot is nearby so come Spring I could give it another go. The arrow leading straight to the message on the door would certainly support that writing as the subject, which connects with another comment as well.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


James Billings replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

I love that one too!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Stephen Fretz on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

The color work is mostly quite strong - it's got that Egglestonesque "democratic" quality, in which there is no subject against a background, but rather the entire frame is the "subject."

I don't do much BW and don't feel qualified to comment on them. But yeah, your color is pretty dialed in as is.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sroyon replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

I've seen the adjective "democratic" used in connection with Eggleston in the sense that he used to photograph seemingly mundane objects and scenes, but this is a different use (non-hierarchical relationship between subject and background) and I like it!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

I'm honored by the comparison.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

I appreciate that depth of analysis. It's right on, I think, but something I didn't consciously seek out in composing. Very interesting note.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Steve Harper on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

I think you’re too hard on yourself. Most of these shots I cannot criticize at all, but then is that what you want from us? I think hamish
Might have problems with that as comments are supposed to be totally positive. I know because he has censored me from the comments before as he was right to do so.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

With these images specifically, I'm looking for honest feedback about ways to improve. Please add any and all critiques you care to- that's why I've posted these!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alexandre Kreisman on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Hey There,
Good for you!
I'll only talk about the image the makes me snap and please do not take this too harshly, it's just a critique based of how I woud have taken/processed those shots!
Please sound horn : As hamish pointed out the angle is weird, i would have taken this by kneeling in front of the arrow and taken the shot
The Lady with the Hat: Add some vignetting and crop a bit, personally, i would do a square.
Art Supplies: I would have taken the wall from the other side of the wall.
6400 iso: unfortunately cropping s difficult, you may remove the sign, but for me it is the silhouette and surrounding that are too dark
building and marina : I think just dodge and burn the image and you will have what you are looking for.
Hope this helps!
Cheers
Alex
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Thanks for these notes and thanks for inspiring this exercise. I hope many other consider doing the same thing.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alexandre Kreisman replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Me too

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Darren Nelson on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

A couple thoughts/suggestions:

The river shot (is this Chicago?) might work better in color. Not enough contrast in BW

I agree with others I like the parking garage, maybe too much space on the pavement.

The chair shot I might have tried for a lower angle.

Love this idea, might post my own.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Yes, it is the Chicago river walk. I hope you do post your own!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Brancaleone on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

First of all, I do think it is really brave and honest to say the opposite of "like my work, look how good it is!". That in itself is a strength and the hallmark of being able to reflect and step back from what we do. Second of all, the indoor garage scene with naturally desaturated colours I personally find attractive. I am not looking to think who it reminds me of. I want to look at what is in front of my eyes. I call that photography phenomenology (something I am very slowly coming to grips with from reading Husserl's Krisis and Cartesian Meditations). Why do I like it? Because it is deadpan. When I look at street some photography books as learning tools, some photography tries so hard to be striking, but is empty. This one is empty, but it is full. There's a paradox right there. I consider the library a strong composition, if only you crop to the left of the hotel lobby thick pilaster. Then, it becomes mysterious. A story teasing me to look more closely. Beautiful tonal range of blacks and greys. Quite masterful, if I may say so. The last point is that there is something very interesting about the greenhouse picture too. One could imagine a series based on it. Why? Because it presents an aesthetic of misfits. Call it "Misfits" They're not also rans, as suggested at the outset. No, they have their own laws, unwritten principles, hingeing on how to disrupt, provoke, in subtle ways and do something far more interesting than the published prints of some nameless glossy, plastic, street photography on my shelves. It is intriguing. Instead of asking how can I change this, I would ask how can I do more of this? The technical side doesn't distract. What is interesting, then is visual distractions, deliberate visual obstacles, like the pillar. Of course, the literal gaze sees a hotel lobby. End of. But if I just see an "anywhere space whatever" Gilles Deleuze touches on in CInema 2, space is freed up to signify other things. Sorry if I have gone on too much and too long. These are just my thoughts at the end of a very long day. The last thing is this: despite that, I was still willing and keen to write this. So that also mus say something about your photography.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Thanks for the time you spent putting these thoughts down. I have been through them multiple times and they are both constructive and insightful.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Paul Quellin on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Hi Michael. Firstly, I agree we should do more of this. I actually quite like photo 1. I think this comes down to the film you have in the camera at the time and the constraints that imposes. Really wide open might have enabled selective focus, but it looks there was plenty of light... who carries a ND filter all the time? It might have been easier to get that selective focus on medium format, but from the image we don;t know the context, perhaps you had to be sat down too. I think the man in front of her has become the focal point and the image still works for that. The other elements just create some intrigue. Photo 2, well maybe a long lens shot, bring the people to fore, but again, you were there, you known what gear you had and maybe sometimes it is better to still obtain a record than have none. Photo 3. Easy to see there was some potential, maybe it was the shadow in the middle of the road. I like the kerb idea too, but not sure how repositioning might have help use that more... I did wonder if the electric bikes across the road might have had potential as the main subject. Photo 4. I think this one is a strong image. There are leading lines. They take us to two closed doors and we wonder what is behind them... probably parking, but there is something to wonder about. Had to have been a difficult exposure and I think it is handled well. I like this one. For photo 5. I wondered about the figure on the left. Maybe this person could have been the focal point, moving the pillar to the right more. The pillar seems to support the photo frame, so I think that is a strong element, though it does also divide the image, leaving space on the right I am not sure about. Technically difficult I think and nicely exposed.For photo 6. You were constrained by surroundings and I could only agree, the colour of the background isn't helping. Phoenix is funny stuff of course and had there been a blue sky it might have painted it a really wild colour to help. Photo 7. I rather like this one, there is intrigue there. Why the swivel chair here. There are strong lines. I think this one might have been a good subject for mono too. I absolutely understand that concern about trying to find the right cropping ratio for some images...something I often struggle with with 2 1/4 square. Photo 8, I could only agree that it needs shallow dept but with the focal point just shifting along to that plate. Of course it is distinctly possible that any of us might have come away with similar photos given the constraints of film, camera, light and surroundings on the day. I do think there are often may other factors at play as well as the skill and experience of the photographer. I think number 4 is my favourite.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Paul, your notes make me aware of a gap in my knowledge. While I feel pretty comfortable with how the emulsions I tend to use will render various scenes and light, I flip between a handful of lenses. Because of this and the fact that I haven't done specific gear testing, I don't know which lenses will do what with bokeh at all the apertures and distances. I am consciously trying to achieve separation when I want it with proximity more so that opening up the aperture, but in this situation even a stop down (the FE2 I was using can shoot at 1/4000 so I could have even without an ND) would have helped. I also like your concept of making the figure in silhouette the main subject. Regarding the chair in the greenhouse, I find myself drawn to scenes that are monochrome in the sense that there is a dominant color (here, green), but not really any others.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Hume on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Hi Michael - I have a bit of a different take on the featured image. You say "Cool light, decent colors, but what’s the story? I’m fine with words sometimes, but I don’t want it to be the subject, and it feels like it is here. These words bear no connection to the rest of the image." But to me the words seem perfect. The place is deserted, so sounding your horn will do no good at all; just noise into the void. The photo becomes an existentialist metaphor for the pointlessness of existence. Camus would approve I'm sure.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sroyon replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

Great comment! Sometimes it's good to ask "What's the story?" but I also think that sometimes we can leave it to the viewer to interpret or insert their own story, just like you did here :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 21/01/2026

A salient comment on philosophy from a man who shares the name of a famous one. I like the image more thanks to your perspective; thank you.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Curtis Heikkinen on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

For what it is worth, I will relate my reaction to a few of these images. Personally, I think you are too critical of these images. I especially like the feature image. I can see it as a commentary on the impersonal nature of modern society. I think David Hume makes a good point about the significance of the sign. It points of the futility of protesting or trying to change things. I like the lady with the hat. My eye went to her hat. The image left me with questions, which is a good thing. Who are these people? Why are they gathered there? The picture with the big beam I like as well, though perhaps the beam is too prominent in the middle of the image. I rather like the final image of the old car . To me it could fit quite well in a small project of images about time and how the past fades away. The out of focus works with a theme of receding time and memories fading away.

Anyway, these thoughts are what occur to me. A few of the images that I noted resonate more with me, but I’m not sure I would consider any of them to be a failure. Thanks for posting them and requesting reactions. I enjoyed thinking about them.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

Thanks for your thoughts. I appreciate them and agree with what you noted in others' comments as well.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Geoff Chaplin on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

I hesitate to criticise other people's work knowing a large proprtion of my own images are rubbish or meeehh. Before taking a photograph i look again at the scene and ask questions. What is it that attracts me to the scene? Is there a specic subject and if so do other elements if the scene detract or add? And other questions such as contrast, light angle, other non-visual elements (sound, smells, tactile texture) and how to incorporate them. I often end up walking away and not taking the photo.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Geoff Chaplin replied:

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

Questions can be revisited in post - does a cropped image work better, does a change in contrast or overall brightness help etc

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

Your process sounds similar to what I strive to do. It's like talking to the space and figures in it. It's such immersive interaction, even when we walk away without pressing the shutter.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

Like other commenters, I think you view your photos too negatively. Except for the pure flower shot, I think all the photos are okay. There are minor details that could be considered. In the harbour photo, the details in the depths could be better, and the concrete pillar is too dominant. As I said, minor details. I also think it's good that you're putting your photos up for critique here. Not everyone can or is willing to do that. It's the only way we can improve. We also need confirmation of our work from time to time. Thank you for sharing!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

Thank you for your post. What might you do in those two scenes you reference to remedy? Moving the pillar in the frame was a challenge for me because I didn't want to put it to close to the edge- or the middle- so it just kind of ended up there. I know people carry visual weight, but I feared the figure on the left and the beam far right would make the edges to heavy and the middle relatively empty. Perhaps I could have only included a portion of the beam on the right edge?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

I would have exposed the harbour photo a little more on the shadows to get more detail in the depths. Perhaps that can still be improved. I'm undecided about the hotel lobby. Only a section to the left of the column with the person in the background. I chose a different location, as some commentators also suggest. But I wasn't there. When I look at the picture, the column immediately catches my eye; it divides the picture. But that's just my insignificant opinion. Thank you, Michael.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sroyon on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

This is a nice concept for a post!

I like "Sound Horn". My eyes are naturally drawn to pretty light, so for me that was the main subject and not the text. If anything I might have cropped out the pillar on the right.

I also like "Art Supplies" and I personally don't think the grass is too bright. It adds to the surreal and artsy (reinforced by "art supplies") feel of the image. Or if it bothers you, you could selectively desaturate the grass in post, to temper its visual weight.

Speaking of post, and to answer your question, I think moving objects around is okay for some types of commercial and art photography, but not for images which implicitly or explicitly purport to be documentary.

And continuing on the post-processing theme, for the bookshelves photo, you could consider using software to correct both barrel distortion, as well as perspective distortion/straightening (similar to using a tilt-shift lens).

Once again, thanks for the interesting post and the nice images which made me look longer and deeper than I look at most photographs these days :)
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

I appreciate your post especially. You clearly know your stuff, and I'll be seeking out any posts you may have on this page.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

Lady in the hat - dodge the hat and her striped top
Burn in the rest subtly especially the sky with a vignette
She’ll stand out
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

Good idea. I think burning the gentleman in front of her would help quite a bit too. Didn't even think to do that here; great idea.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

You’re too hard on yourself
A
Little work with digital darkroom / darkroom on the BW and some tweaking curves would solve everything
Bringing out what you want and vision
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Rollin Banderob on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

Love the idea of these posts and had originally missed Alexandre's, so very glad you are continuing the concept.
1 - I'm not getting a connection between the people and buildings. If the hat is of interest feels like a horizontal of the heads would work better???? Perhaps the structure of the round chairs and the hat is more interesting than the buildings.
2 - I think as has been said, some dodging with contrast, and burning would give it the pop and bring out the content you want.
3 - A style of photography I struggle with so feel I can not give useful insight.
4 - When I first saw it on my phone thought maybe too lose, but now on a monitor, and I bet more so properly printed I like it! Has feeling, details to notice, relationships to think about. I think a case when the awkward angle adds to it.
5 - The way the pillar is cut off at the top bothers me. I don't find the exit sign a distraction, and think cropping to just above it makes the image stronger. I like the silhouette to discover.
7 - I like the similar color of the hose and part of the chair, but I think how the hose enters the frame is not working real well for me. Maybe stepping to the right it would be better? As to moving things this image feels like a found scene, but in the end that is up to the artist.
8 - I feel the arch in the background pulls away from the car, and all the space at the top does not add to the composition. A car with great lines like this I don't think the license plate is where I would place the focus. The colors work well.

Good work overall, and again thank you for putting yourself up for feedback!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 22/01/2026

You've offered valuable reflections. Thank you for your ideas and willingness to offer your eye and experience. I agree about the hose. I was very hesitant to move anything and was invigorated to try to compose a scene that wasn't set up in a naturally simple way. You can see the aisle with greenery on either side. I was about as far right as I could get as that aisle continued the entire length. For the car, I took several images and found this to be the most disappointing. The surroundings were not very complementary to the subject, so I did what I could to isolate. Even so, I also agree with you that the background, blurry as it is, takes away.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


James Billings on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 23/01/2026

This a process I feel I need to do more often. In any roll of film, there's always a few (or a lot...) of "meh" images which just don't come out how intended. Usually I just dismiss them, the negative goes into the folder, the scan stays on the hard drive... and I think no more.
But thinking a bit more about why it didn't work out is probably what I should be doing!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 23/01/2026

It's not as scary as it seems, especially on a platform like this where people are knowledgeable AND considerate with their feedback.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


bikenerd on Reflecting on a few of my own failures

Comment posted: 24/01/2026

I really like 'Art Supplies' - that it's nearly liminal, the scatter of rental bikes, the 2D-looking stop sign, and the curve of the curb coming into the viewer's lap.
'Please Sound Horn' looks like something I would shoot. I dig the color palette and the light on the wall to the left. I might brighten the arrow and white lines to make them more clearly the subject.
I also love the colors of the Greenhouse Chair shot. Maybe I would have moved a couple steps to the right, to make the background the table full of plants. But obviously I can't see what else that would have changed.
Great stuff all in all, nobody hits the mark 100% (or even 50%) of the time. Sometimes when I get scans back or go to edit my digital shots, I wonder what the hell I was looking at when I tripped the shutter.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Michael Murray replied:

Comment posted: 24/01/2026

Thanks for your notes. You mentioned the colors in the greenhouse and chair. I want to note that the tones on Lomo '92 seemed pretty good in outdoor clear skies, but got muddy really fast in cloudy and indoor scenes, even when the light meter said it was bright enough. If I shot it again, I'd meter around 200 for outside, but down to 160 if I was going to be inside or in overcast conditions.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *