Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

By Chris Hooke

A Month with a silly little Half Frame. Why?There’s so many reasons why I really didn’t need this camera.

Ridicule and embarrassment is two of them. Its a silly little thing. A digital half-frame? I mainly shoot 35mm film and have never had the desire for a Pen D as I don’t see the point. Sometimes I struggle to shoot 36 images, why the hell would I want 72? And the price?? £699 in the UK when it was first released in the middle of 2025. You must be joking.

On the other hand, I love Fujifilm digital cameras. The sad truth is that I can’t afford one now. I’m too tight (and sensible) to pay £500 for a 15 year old camera. The original x100 is a beauty, but I paid £350 ten years ago and I don’t think they’ve started spewing gold out of the SD card slot since then. I sold all of my fuji cameras along time ago for a lot less than it would cost me to replace them. The hipsters have turned them into expensive Instagram treasures.

So, I resisted the temptation. I went on holiday carrying my Nikon D610 and had a lovely time, ignoring the pain in my shoulders and back. The Greek sunsets spoke to me and said “I bet you’re glad you have a full frame”, but the hot sweaty nights whispered “It would have been easier carrying that little X-Half”. I would wake, and as the dream faded like a morning fog, I would wonder if I’d brought the right camera? Was there a tiny travel camera to relieve my aching bones? Read on to find out.

Unfortunately, I came back from holiday quite ill. I was eventually diagnosed with COPD. My days of carrying multiple cameras around London, film testing for my etsy store, were consigned to the past. I found that I struggled carrying a film & digital camera around. If only there was a solution? I had a lovely little 35mm Rollei 35se that weighed nothing. What could be the answer to my digital conundrum?

I’d read Hamish’s article where he said he basically appreciated the X-Half, but didn’t see the need to have one. I had replied that I would be happy to get one. Now was my opportunity. Now I had a medical excuse that no one could argue with. This was a matter of life and death (not really), and even though I would struggle to get a prescription for one, I could happily tell the doctor I was making lifestyle changes to combat this thing. The prices had slowly come down to £599 in my local retailer, but I found a deal online (sorry) for a returned item for £449. I couldn’t say no… and I didn’t.

It arrived in perfect condition. In gorgeous black (obviously). It appealed straight away. Of course, it was small, but that’s the whole point. I had already got a hood for it and case to keep it looking good. This wasn’t for if I decided it was rubbish and needed to sell it on, fast. Purely for aesthetic reasons. Eager to get out with my pocket rocket, I charged the battery (usb charging)  and turned it on. Oh no! Thought I. Its broken. It took an eternity (a second or two) to start up. Like I say, i shoot film and love how it makes you slow down the imaging process, but come on, I can take a photo straight away with most film cameras. This is a (potentially) £699 camera, and its making me wait before I can take a photo? (I know, I know, I’m such a snowflake) Never mind, I thought, I’m sure a firmware upgrade will take care of that (It hasn’t, still waiting Fujifilm?)

After a quick fiddling, I got to grips with this tiny marvel. It takes an age to focus, then an equal amount of time to write to the memory card (not sure what I’m using but it worked fine on the humungous D610). Oh yes, and did I mention that the touchscreen is pretty useless? It works when it wants to, which is a problem as that’s the only way to navigate the menus. I disregarded these hiccups as I was sure that out in the field (streets, I don’t shoot in fields), this little camera would shine.

Took a few snapshots. Meh! They were ok. They didn’t blow me away but maybe that was down to me. Had a few days around my hometown of Nottingham. It was still slow, but this camera is advertised as giving the film “look” with its simulations. It does strike me that the tech guys at Fuji took that to the extreme and thought they would design it to replicate a 50 year old camera that needs a service. Or maybe they just had a bad day. Considering they got it so right with the x100 and the series it spawned, it worries me that this will be the one and only iteration of the half series. Its almost as if they got bored while building this camera. Like I say, its slow. The wind on lever is an interesting concept. You lock the camera into film mode so you have to shoot a “roll” from beginning to end. You wind on for each shot. There’s no feedback from the lever and half the time you don’t know if you can take the next shot. I missed a few photos by the camera not “winding on”. Annoying but something I’m sure I’d get used to (still miss shots with my film cameras because I’ve not wound on). One thing I do like is that you then “develop” the images in app and are given a contact sheet of you images. Now that is something that redeems this little camera slightly. Its a gimmick but its something that no other camera offers you.

London

So it came to the big test. A couple of days in London after Xmas with its film partner, the Rollei 35se. One thing I had noticed was that this camera needs good light, especially for the colour film simulations. Luckily the forecast was good. I found myself shooting in Chrome in good light and Acros (and Red filter) in less than optimal lighting conditions (most of the time in the UK). Not a problem as I mainly shoot B&W film, but I would normally use a digital camera for colour work, so I suppose it did defeat the object of using this camera, but at this point I could still fool myself that the camera ticked at least a few of the boxes.

Monday in London was wonderful. A beautiful, crisp winters day with brilliant blue skies and a cold freshness to the air that did wonders for my lungs. I was a bit worried that i would struggle as I get out of breath very easily now but that was the whole point of this exercise. Travelling light and stopping in a pub or cafe when i got too tired. So that was what we did. First port of call was the very photogenic George on Borough High Street. An old coaching Inn that me and the wife had wanted to try for a long time. Roaring log fires and a scotch egg later, the Rollei 35se was loaded with HP5 and off we went for a leisurely stroll around Southwark & Bermondsey. The X-Half was very well behaved and only struggled when the sun started to go down. Once the light dims the shutter speed drops on this automatic camera and unless you have a tripod, the shake will appear on your photos and the images become very muddy. With it being such a small sensor, grain and lack of dynamic range is a problem.

Tuesday brought cloud. Therefore, that brought a change to the Acros film simulation. This is quite nice as you can add Red, Yellow and Green filters. I went for Red for no more reason than its my favourite colour. As luck would have it, I noticed on Faceache that there was an exhibition at the Tate in Millbank of Lee Miller’s photographs and life. Well worth a visit and pushed the Fuji as the light was challenging, but it shined. The rest of the day went well. Black & white is more forgiving but can be a challenge that I enjoy when shooting film. Looking for interesting shapes and situations is the joy of pure photography.

Conclusion (Sort of)

I do think that this is the point of this camera. It is so far from perfect. You have to find out just what you want to use it for. When shooting black & white, it gives a definite film look. I added some grain in the settings and I think some of these photos are quite pleasing. The focus did hunt at times, but I found myself persevering with it. Of course, if I had my Sony a7ii it probably wouldn’t have hunted at all. But then I would have been looking for perfection which is not what this camera is about. With film, we very rarely get perfection but are pleasantly surprised when we do and I think this is where this camera is aimed. At the pure pleasure of taking photos and looking at them as the images they are, and not what lightroom can make them. I have not edited any of these images as I would the RAW files from my Sony (the Fuji only shoots Jpeg). So maybe I have gained something there. Simplicity? A kind of digital Zen? Now I am being far to generous to this camera. When its all said and done, its slow and expensive which is a pretty poor tagline. I recently paid £70 for a Nikon F with a Nikkor 55mm 3.5 lens. I pay maybe £15 to buy a roll of film and have it developed (I scan myself). So after 40 rolls of film (1440 images) I would have paid as much as buying the Fuji at original price. Maybe by then the firmware will have got rid of all the negatives, but I very much doubt it.

Final Opinion

I was quite excited to get the Fuji X-Half. It disappointed to begin straight away, and unfortunately it has barely redeemed itself. If you live in a country with 365 days of sunshine, it will be with you every day. Its one of those cameras that you want to pick up and take photos with. Then when you turn it on and wait an age to take a photo, you remember just how frustrating it is as a camera. I can’t live with that when I have paid that much money for it. I’m sure that Fuji started out with good intentions that should have materialised into a monumental event like its great grandfather, the x100.

It isn’t, which is pretty unforgiveable from Fuji. Its a camera that people will still buy and a lot will like, despite its foibles. But I think a month is pretty much as long as I need to realise I need to recoup some of the money I’ve spent and move on to the next one

Share this post:

About The Author

By Chris Hooke
I'm a UK based amateur photographer who first picked up a camera, many moons ago. Shot film through the 80's and 90's, took 20 years to realise that digital depressed me. Now, here I am, playing with and selling all the cameras I couldn't afford when I was younger, and telling people about it
Read More Articles From Chris Hooke

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Ibraar Hussain on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Such an interesting article and enjoyed the photos
I hope you overcome those COPD symptoms with exercise and less use of any inhaler.
I’ve absolutely zero interest and had zero interest in shooting
With (little less
Owning) this teenage orientated camera. Just I’ve now no interest in anything that intentionally fakes analogue - even when it comes to battery powered bicycles. (Though
I used to enjoy hipstamatic which makes more sense than this) But that doesn’t mean I haven’t been interest in reading about it and peoples experiences. It’s as I expected most of the time. Thanks again
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke replied:

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Thanks for the kind words, Ibraar. I have good days and bad days but trying to get as much gentle exercise as I can. I am with you when it comes to "trends". I'm a film man and always will be. On the other hand, I applaud Fujfilm for at least trying something different. If it maybe sways a few hipsters into progressing to film, then that has to be a good thing. I suppose getting away from the gazillion megapixel monsters and making people slow down and enjoy the moment in a small package is where they were aiming, and I don't think they are a million miles away from it with this camera. I just don't think you and I will be converts !!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Brashtown Czar on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

I've read that the purpose of this camera is the opposite of what you hoped; it is not a cute daily carry for people accustomed to high-end or even film gear, but an attempt to lure Instax shooters into something better and potentially eventually onramp them into Fujifilm's proper X-series cameras (of which it is not at all an actual example). This makes sense to me, and appears to be working well for Fujifilm, as the sales numbers are quite high especially in specific countries. But yes, it seems bound to disappoint someone like yourself. Thanks for the photos and review and I hope your condition improves!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke replied:

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Thank you for the kind words. I agree with you that this little camera is going to tempt people to have a play and maybe, progress to something better, whether that be an x-series or film. I certainly commend Fujifilm for trying something different, and like you say, it appears to be working. Afterall, I bought one, and even though it wasn't for me I hope that the people that are buying it genuinely enjoy the freedom it gives them in such a small package. Maybe one day the useability will improve, and it will be a camera that ticks all the boxes for me. Until then, I'll stick with my Leica iiia and a roll of HP5 !!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Bob Janes on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Odd, isn't it (in a dissapointing sort of way). For me, the things that set a half-frame camera aside are a very compact size (which this camera has) combined with a portrait-oriented viewfinder (which it also has) and a half-frame sensor (which is the big thing that is absent here).
Could they not have produced a camera with the X100 sensor turned through 90 degrees in as small a body as possible, with less MP and an f/2.8 lens?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke replied:

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

I agree Bob. Its almost as if they got everything right with the styling and the thought process behind it, and then it got to Friday and forgot all about the sensor and took something out of a 2000's point and shoot. I really hope they address it with a mark 2 version as they could end up with something really good

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gerard on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Hi Bob, thanks for your honest story and telling about your 'adventure' with the Fuji.
My conclusion is that it is a pricey gimmick, and thus a waste of money.
Please keep photographing! And take care.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Cdlinz on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

I've had the half since it was first released. I love the damn fool little thing. It is a tiny, cute grab and go snap shooter. I don’t really use the gimmicky stuff eg the filters and rarely do diptych. But on the other hand I don’t feel constrained by the things about which people complain like slow start up, and find the autofocus adequate. For me it just lowers the stakes of the whole endeavor- i carry it, i take pictures, i may get a great shot or I might not, no big deal. It’s fun! I think fuji probably overplayed their hand and folks' expectations of this camera are not realistic. One thing about it that is for sure like film photography is that you never know what it’s gonna give you and l like that and it’s a helluva lot cheaper than shooting film. (I like to carry it as a backup to my film camera its tiny footprint makes it perfect for this.)
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

I think its great that Fujifilm are trying something different, and I agree that it is a good little everyday camera, but its the price that I just can't get my head around.
I think that Fujifilm have looked at the silly prices that people are paying for their second hand cameras, and thought "what the hell", which left me feeling a bit short changed.
I hope they get it right with the mark 2, because it is a camera that needs to be out there.
Hope you carry on enjoying yours
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Gary Smith on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

One of your comments really struck me: I too struggle to shoot 36 exposures of film. It seems the camera is always yelling at me to "Finish the roll". I can't imagine having a half-frame camera (digital or film). At the moment I'm considering going the other way by searching for a 6 x 6 Rolleiflex. 12 shots is more like it!

Thanks for your article.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke replied:

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Hi Gary, I'm glad I'm not the only one who feels like that. Sometimes I can have cameras hanging around for weeks with half finished film. I'm with you with the Rolleiflex. I have a few and always manage to finish the roll. Not only that, because you only have the 12 shots, it makes you more focussed on getting the right images. Thanks for taking the time to read the article. Maybe the next one will be about the Rolleiflex !!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Your article got me thinking about the global potential of this type of camera. I believe Fujifilm never does anything without careful consideration, which has always been evident. They also occupy niche markets, which adds up in the big picture. Last year, the X-HALF was the best-selling camera in Japan for several months. Japan has often been a pioneer for global trends, and this seems to be the case here as well. We here at 35mmc may not be able to understand this; we know the importance of aperture, shutter speed and ASA, we still or once again take photographs on film and even develop them ourselves.

Here in Germany, I see fewer and fewer people walking around with a "camera". Even tourists are increasingly using smartphones to take souvenir photos. Quantity is what counts, not quality. The photos are viewed on the smartphone display, upright! Most of my acquaintances and friends had an SLR camera years ago, but analogue cameras have mostly been replaced by compact cameras, which no longer exist today. The mobile phone has become the standard camera. The trend now is retro, small and handy, and Fujifilm seems to have had the right instinct.
I won't be buying one myself. I enjoy taking photos with the Olympus PEN FV with 72 shots or with my digital PEN E-P5, which, like all Olympus MFT cameras, offers the 3:4 format, which I like to use from time to time. But as I said, we at 35mmc are not the target audience. Definitely not!

Thanks for the article, Chris!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke replied:

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Thanks for the comment, Walter. I do agree. I fully appreciate what Fujifilm are doing. Rather than pursuing megapixels and cameras you need a mortgage to buy, they have targeted the iPhone generation. Successfully it seems. If the form factor encourages people to actually carry a camera again, then that has to be a benefit to all of us. I just dread to think how much the Mark II will cost !!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Christopher Welch on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Hi Chris thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts on this new camera. I hope your health improves. I’m curious about this camera too… like why a half frame in digital? Guess Fujifilm knows something we don’t. I love Fujifilm digitals and my first digital was a FinePix S5500 and I loved it. It went everywhere with me until it’s untimely demise. I’d love a x100v just to have all the film simulations. But influencers and content creators have made them unattainable.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke replied:

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Thanks for reading the article Christopher (what a great name !!) I think the idea is an interesting one, and if it introduces a film experience to newcomers then it has done its job. Funnily enough I sent the x-half back and bought an x100f with the proceeds. Luckily it wasn't too over the top in price but still as much as I paid for one 4 years ago. I can't believe that the original x100 is still fetching £400. I sold my last one for £200 and I'm kicking myself

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


David Hume on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Hi Chris - nice article… and I feel much aligned with what you say. I played with one for an evening and didn't have any desire to get one for myself but it did bring to my mind some interesting directions in Fuji that I hope to see more. As an aside I ended up buying a like a D Lux 8 as a travel camera despite it's crazy price and that's a decision that I'm very happy with. It doesn't have the immediate appeal of a Fuji but it's just so competent that I could happily take it with me as my only camera to travel situations that it's designed for and be very happy with the results. Anyway, I do think the direction that Fuji is going (I don't know if you've seen the new video camera that's full of gimmicks but looks really fun?) Is very interesting.

I think the take home from me out of this camera is that something very small without a power zoom is great. And I also think that 1 inch sensor is stellar. In combination with what Fuji can get out of it in terms of its JPEGs. I think Fuji is really nailing that and even with my D Lux I'm not shooting Raw on holidays because they JPEG are so good. Even though for my taste I do need to post process with my own presets which I probably would do anyway. And if Leica really wanted to, they could fix it up with additions to their lLieca camera app. Anyway, interesting to read and it has reminded me that I'm enthusiastic for the future of this little 1 inch sensor and what Fiji might bring out of it if they made it into a nice little baby brother to an X100
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke replied:

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Thanks for the comment David, and taking the time to have a read of the article. I'm quite sad that I didn't feel that the x-half was for me. I've now got hold of an x100f. Slightly bigger and far more complicated to a casual user. I think that is the point with the little x-half. Fujifilm are trying to lure the iPhone generation away from their phones and I think they have to be commended for that. As for buying a D-Lux, I am very jealous. I had a D-Lux 3 many years ago and those photos are some of the best I have ever took !! Regards Chris

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Jeffery Luhn on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 11/02/2026

Chris,
I enjoyed your well written piece on the small Fuji X-Half. You described several reasons not to own that camera, and seemed to mostly forgive it's many faults. With today's cell cameras doing such a great job, it's difficult to understand the rational of that Fujifilm product. One of our pockets holds a cell phone. Another holds our house/car keys. Where's the room for a small camera? On a shoulder strap? If I'm going to carry a camera on a strap, I want the effort to yield quality images. It is quite surprising that it sold so well in Japan, a country where 99% of the population carry cell cameras. If Fujifilm makes money on that camera, it will be do to clever marketing, not performance. Obviously, I don't get it. But....I'm for anything that gives joy from photography. Even that camera.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke replied:

Comment posted: 11/02/2026

I agree Jeffrey. Its a strange one for anyone who takes their photography seriously, although I must admit now I do miss its tiny form. Maybe if the results had been better, then I would have kept it. Yet, I am happy to accept the indifferent images I will sometimes get from a roll of HP5 in my Nikon. Do we now expect too much from digital? At that price, I think its reasonable to ask for more. I think we must commend Fujifilm for trying to tempt a new generation away from their phones, and I think that is where they have aimed this camera. If those people then decide they like the film aesthetic and go and buy a 35mm camera, that has to be a win. Ultimately, if that then brings the price of film down, I am more than happy with that. I won't hold my breath though

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 11/02/2026

The high sales figures in Japan do not surprise me. The Japanese are very open to new products because they are keen on innovation. Japan is considered the ideal test market for new products in the camera industry. Products that are successful there usually also have good chances on the global market.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Christian Hogue on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 13/02/2026

Good breakdown!
I itialky I thought it was a silly toy camera. A gimmick!
Then I played with one a couple of times in a camera shop. And was very intrigued. Yes it was a bit slow.yes it was a one inch sensor. Jpg only hmmm
BUT it was much cheaper than anything else in the fuji range. Loved the swipable film look thingy. produced some lovey images, I also like the across red filter sim and the provia for sunshine countries, Thailand and Australia.
It onoy really suffered in low light. But then that can be turned to an advantage.
It's much lighter cheaper and more compact than a x100. So now its my everyday carry. My xt3 only comes out for special occasions now. But it's been eclipsed by my nikon zf with the amazing 40 f2 or a vintage lense form my collection for serious shooting. The rest of my rather unreliable fuji gear will be sold off. Except the xhalf
BUT
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Chris Hooke replied:

Comment posted: 13/02/2026

You know, Christian, I hate to admit it that I do kind of miss the little x-half. Don't get me wrong, I have moved on and managed to get an x100f for the same price. But even though the 100f is no brick by any stretch of the imagination, its still a job to get it to fit in my coat pocket. I find myself reminiscing about the little film winder, even though it was next to useless. Would I buy another? No. Do I wish I kept it? No. But like you say.......there's something. I really hope that Fuji blow everyone away with the mark 2 as there is a market out there. If it makes people put their phones down and think a bit more about the images they are producing, then that can only be a good thing. Maybe Fuji have got it right and we are wrong. Then again. I have a zfc and, my oh my, Nikon are producing cameras that I seriously want to marry. Could be exciting times. Thanks for reading and commenting, Christian, much appreciated

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Ibraar Hussain on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 13/02/2026

Chris have you tried Hipstamatic ?
That was great fun - square format snaps which I wrote about here https://35mmc.platform81preview.com/15/05/2025/hipstamatic-work-on-your-square-compositions-with-the-coolest-iphone-photo-camera/
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Kainoa on Fuji X-Half – Trying to prove Hamish wrong… and failing

Comment posted: 19/02/2026

Great article. I finally had a chance to handle one in store recently...for the price...meh. Interestingly, it seems when folks look for a small digital to compliment their film gear-I rarely hear the best option. Micro 4/3. From the PEN F and all its beauty to the GM1's tiny-ness. And the easy adaptability of vintage lenses. I've found the M43 platform to be the perfect travel digital system and compliment to my film gear.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *