5 Frames with a Fujifilm X-T5 – Back to Basics Naturally

By Simon Sheldon

I recently bought a new digital camera, a Fujifilm X-T5 and while setting it up on and began to wonder about all the different automatic options. I have never really liked Autofocus, it’s convenient but can be annoying, if like me you use one focus point but want to focus on something not taken in by that point, either by moving the camera and pressing a button or making a change on the touchscreen. So, I thought, why not try manual focus, I focus my Hasselblad with a plain screen with no problems, damn it, I focus some cameras by guesstimating, I figured that the EVF on the X-T5 should be good enough to focus with, and it was.

Having gone down this rabbit hole it occurred to me that I could also use the EFV to judge exposure, so I set the sensitivity to 400asa and aperture and shutter to manual and off I went. This felt very natural to me having been taking photos for nearly 50 years, focus set the shutter and aperture till it looks ok to the meter or my best guess and press the button. I’m sure others have tried this before so I can’t claim to have made a great discovery, I just wanted to share what has been for me a new perspective on digital photography.

Why not just stick to the cameras auto functions? With focus this makes me think about what I am focusing on and move that focus point without taking my eye off the subject. I don’t use the electronic focus aids built into the camera because they are too intrusive and obscure my view. As for exposure I like being able to quickly see what changing the exposure will make and adjust accordingly, I tend to set the shutter speed and ASA and then work with the aperture to get the results I want. I leave the auto white balance alone, shoot JPEG and pick a film simulation that suits me.

Is it better or easier? I’m not sure on either, but it feels very natural to me and feels like I have much more control, no need to use the exposure compensation dial and I now tend to take more than one picture at different exposures, like old fashioned bracketing. One other advantage is that I should be able to switch between camera brands without too much relearning. This of course works best with mirrorless cameras, or ones with hybrid viewfinders.

One thing that annoys me is that modern lenses don’t often come with focus markings, I have confidently guesstimated focus on many cameras and would be happy to try the same on a digital. If anyone else has tried this or wants to try I would love to hear there thoughts
All photos were shot with a Fujifilm X-T5 set at 400 ASA using classic -chrome




Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Miguel Mendez on 5 Frames with a Fujifilm X-T5 – Back to Basics Naturally

Comment posted: 04/02/2026

Hola Simon. Uso una nikon de 40 con un 50 mm manuan y calculo la exposicion. A veces acierto. No hay autofoco ni automatico . Soleado 16 y distancia hiperfocal pero a veces es lento .
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Marcus Gunaratnam on 5 Frames with a Fujifilm X-T5 – Back to Basics Naturally

Comment posted: 04/02/2026

vernier accuracy is assured using the split image prism veiw finder and for zooms in mid range (or std 50mm lens) quick focussing is possible especially when surrounded by a microprism collar,as evidenced by the interchangeble veiwfinder screens,almost as fast as auto focus.Ground glass focusing can take time as one hunts for sharpest focus.My experience with rapid autofocus is that one has ample time to sharpen image via the veiw finder in most of situations.Ultra wide shots tend to be confined to landscapes and will not need a fast focus,so would a posed Portrait, and microphotography .Wedding 'shots'may take time to compose and flash (unless you use the film version of Olympus penFT) sync for electronic flash at 1/40th.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Simon Sheldon replied:

Comment posted: 04/02/2026

Marcus, the electronic prisms and split image are too intrusive and too hard to switch on and off at will. If I were shooting either very close or in low light it might be necessary to use an aid but by and large it’s fine. As I said my hasselblad has a plain glass screen and I have no issues with that

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Khürt Williams replied:

Comment posted: 04/02/2026

Marcus — I can see that working well with slower-moving or stationary subjects. For the kind of subjects I shoot, though — small birds moving fast and unpredictably — manual focus just isn’t practical. There simply isn’t time to hunt for focus, so I rely heavily on focus-tracking AF.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sroyon on 5 Frames with a Fujifilm X-T5 – Back to Basics Naturally

Comment posted: 05/02/2026

If you like focus markings you can try manual focus lenses, either in Fuji mount (e.g. I had a TTArtisan 35/0.95) or vintage lenses used with an adaptor. Autofocus lenses generally don't have them because most of them (I believe) are focus-by-wire and don't have a hard stop at infinity.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Khürt Williams on 5 Frames with a Fujifilm X-T5 – Back to Basics Naturally

Comment posted: 09/02/2026

Simon, this is a really thoughtful piece, and the images reflect a calm, deliberate way of working that aligns closely with the process you describe.

Your use of the EVF as a continuous exposure preview is how I work as well. I think that’s disciplined seeing: deciding on exposure before the shutter fires. Fuji’s commitment to direct, physical controls is what makes that approach feel right to me; it’s not something most mirrorless systems encourage in the same way.

A small terminology note, offered gently: on a modern digital camera like the X-T5 the sensitivity setting is ISO rather than ASA, which is now a deprecated film standard. The exposure logic you’re describing is completely sound — it’s just that the language sometimes lags behind the technology, as it often does for those of us who learned on film.

I should also say that while I admire the manual focus mindset you describe, I personally lean heavily on autofocus these days — multiple eye surgeries mean I’d probably be done with photography without it. That said, the way of thinking you outline still feels very familiar.

Your post nicely captures why I moved to Fuji nearly ten years ago and stayed: these cameras are clearly designed by people who remember how photographers used to work, and who trust that memory rather than trying to abstract it away.

As David duChemin has said:
The hardest job of the photographer is seeing the way the camera sees.

Thanks for sharing this — it’s a quietly affirming reminder that digital can still reward intentional, hands-on photography.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Jeffery Luhn on 5 Frames with a Fujifilm X-T5 – Back to Basics Naturally

Comment posted: 10/02/2026

Simon,
I laughed out loud at the ICBM shot!!! Can I show that to my photography students? The car shot (Iso Grifo?) looks like it's going 100mph while it's standing still. I have shot with Fujifilm cameras and I love their layout and feel. I wish they had come out earlier. I'm so invested in Nikon that a new brand would be an expensive distraction, but if a deal comes up on one, I may bite. Regarding auto-focus: I could not live without it. Of course my vintage folding cameras are rangefinders, and my various TLRs are ground glass...and they are difficult for my 73-year-old eyes. My Pentax 645N has auto focus and for being an old camera, it's spot on. Super fast focus, even at dusk. To each his own. Keep posting!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *